{"id":"W2075199413","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.06.105","title":"Accounting for context in studies of health inequalities: a review and comparison of analytic approaches","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Annals of Epidemiology","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Confounding; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Medicine; Statistics; Inequality; Flexibility (engineering); Socioeconomic status; Health equity; Demography; Mathematics; Environmental health; Population; Public health; Geography; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06941482,0.003783336,0.01317718,0.01572162,0.001265097,0.006072446,0.005716555,0.003051659,0.00355178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1663646,0.00177783,0.01293777,0.0259023,0.002270695,0.00789669,0.005059134,0.002799767,0.0003827559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003982612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01220521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0131661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02319365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9569175,0.02809128,0.006699557,0.002780966,0.005112259,0.0003983233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.798519,0.1846616,0.006987425,0.003339153,0.006137209,0.0003557147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004083892,0.0001053455,0.01209864,0.2900999,0.02338373,0.0001118071,0.001280541,0.001674197,0.0002027235,0.0117474,0.004013641,0.6548736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005658091,0.0007071909,0.03947145,0.5415604,0.183287,0.001677007,0.004268982,0.005194548,0.001214432,0.08855305,0.1329545,0.0005456652],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005458544,0.9935452,0.004795031,0.0004951119,0.00008891372,0.0001198017,0.0001672096,0.00001003657,0.0002329192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009264624,0.9740387,0.01561733,0.0003386587,0.0001523002,0.000379734,0.0001436064,0.00001493611,0.00005025707],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3671051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8909083904649753,"score_gpt":0.6510591461236451,"score_spread":0.2398492443413301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}