{"id":"W2075276734","doi":"10.1139/f09-116","title":"Can the data from at-sea observer surveys be used to make general inferences about catch composition and discards?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Discards; Fishing; Observer (physics); Software deployment; Resampling; Fishery; Sampling (signal processing); Inference; Environmental science; Data collection; Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1787772,0.001825392,0.004875033,0.006135995,0.001285965,0.005550633,0.004783696,0.005383817,0.002123293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4642891,0.001754682,0.003185476,0.01092571,0.007533285,0.01700261,0.002766792,0.003428991,0.002615644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002119926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003068167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02953902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02331016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.909424,0.06458063,0.005617291,0.009358292,0.009495896,0.00152392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5700616,0.2565843,0.05871762,0.07481287,0.03814485,0.001678776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009420902,0.0003090334,0.5474349,0.00296869,0.004342648,0.0004074117,0.004058499,0.009957941,0.002102675,0.01179143,0.01696584,0.3987188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002780707,0.001460589,0.7280149,0.003979347,0.002150803,0.0009496193,0.007019206,0.05027257,0.005853173,0.1346756,0.06445204,0.0008941119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3484794,0.02170884,0.4936737,0.07835049,0.006241393,0.001519206,0.00810209,0.002574571,0.03935019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8386796,0.009306472,0.1289131,0.01449299,0.00167158,0.001023742,0.002651997,0.0004651216,0.002795402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1787772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9454758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0790885884701131,"score_gpt":0.2781752907629202,"score_spread":0.1990867022928071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}