{"id":"W2075587512","doi":"10.1139/x06-324","title":"Habitat attributes and chestnut-backed chickadee nest site selection in uncut and partial-cut forests","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Nest box; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Forestry; Geography; Predation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001499074,0.0001788313,0.0001765959,0.0004610806,0.0003563104,0.0004574655,0.0001849905,0.0001531335,0.0009349238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005521431,0.0001745605,0.00009210712,0.000361884,0.0003988968,0.0001544558,0.0003139356,0.0002027272,0.0001074248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005620993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002332628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1321291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6293496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998825,0.00001527581,0.000007095675,0.00003901044,0.0000218893,0.00003419147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995072,0.00006644508,0.0001768335,0.00003213249,0.00006635421,0.000151073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004361043,0.00001464453,0.9957039,0.000006838768,0.00002167256,0.00008292049,0.0003671412,0.00006752494,0.002278228,0.00001493415,0.00003504381,0.001363569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.318786e-7,0.000004671313,0.9997842,8.306803e-7,0.0000014282,0.00002658995,0.0001132052,0.00002390594,0.00001747387,0.000001718017,0.00002499086,5.685482e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998417,0.00003223764,0.000008275458,0.000001871195,2.159572e-7,6.370883e-7,0.00003302342,3.151946e-7,0.0000818175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997279,0.00002684556,0.00004491247,0.000003451606,2.362664e-7,0.000001315106,0.00007461853,5.160956e-7,0.0001201613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1321291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2627201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03056051381015174,"score_gpt":0.2852239898696108,"score_spread":0.2546634760594591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}