{"id":"W2075620909","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9328-0","title":"Argumentum ad Verecundiam: New Gender-based Criteria for Appeals to Authority","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Appeal; Epistemology; Fallacy; Credibility; Injustice; Prejudice (legal term); Sociology; Trustworthiness; Feminist epistemology; Competence (human resources); Adversarial system; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Feminist philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009022263,0.0001069677,0.0001489789,0.00006192064,0.000717291,0.00006314254,0.0001434067,0.0000812794,0.0001628474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002995748,0.0001160849,0.00006220741,0.0001385755,0.00007222928,0.0001143651,0.00002064464,0.00004433604,0.0001459958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001013407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004442041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008629545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998799,0.0002174997,0.0001941781,0.0002740933,0.000195659,0.0003195434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999334,0.0002338177,0.00007594701,0.0001320675,0.00006563233,0.000158476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006520824,0.0004552525,0.02655606,0.000252801,0.000262284,0.000003010199,0.1674918,0.00007297491,0.005162003,0.2510253,0.4195334,0.1285331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002247932,0.0005971396,0.0599877,0.00003317893,0.0001177282,4.91343e-7,0.01116895,0.0002597306,0.004161507,0.1078858,0.8129692,0.0005706568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3072237,0.0003610798,0.5080197,0.06337903,0.007757434,0.00426105,0.0000779708,0.0005706259,0.1083494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789111,0.000008363876,0.01510135,0.002048645,0.0003120686,0.0001160798,0.00003966818,0.000009876482,0.003452849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6716874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5516894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0956511876628936,"score_gpt":0.4103188837154276,"score_spread":0.314667696052534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}