{"id":"W2075620909","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9328-0","title":"Argumentum ad Verecundiam: New Gender-based Criteria for Appeals to Authority","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Appeal; Epistemology; Fallacy; Credibility; Injustice; Prejudice (legal term); Sociology; Trustworthiness; Feminist epistemology; Competence (human resources); Adversarial system; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Feminist philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02391276,0.001388667,0.002175837,0.0123739,0.009439129,0.02566092,0.004463152,0.01243655,0.01602208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09998912,0.00118211,0.002169388,0.005491732,0.04822608,0.04184116,0.01229365,0.01327745,0.002220912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008296336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004228448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001608646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001814188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9567294,0.02445308,0.00391942,0.004142426,0.00852349,0.002232301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9237338,0.04997392,0.005261785,0.006774554,0.01138864,0.002867341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001472648,0.000009520734,0.0001941256,0.00003796388,0.000004581168,0.00004279432,0.002640504,0.00004371563,0.00009622856,0.9938428,0.0009842379,0.002088789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002235903,0.00001663188,0.0004008772,0.0001351369,0.00001529839,0.0001735975,0.003319266,0.0014592,0.0002666751,0.9766517,0.01751356,0.00002577345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0545128,0.002556241,0.3314369,0.03881506,0.003502228,0.000773986,0.0005281497,0.000433392,0.5674413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148034,0.0003771297,0.06658346,0.001558435,0.001218049,0.0008610758,0.0002476809,0.0004028928,0.01394801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02566092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1264642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0956511876628936,"score_gpt":0.4103188837154276,"score_spread":0.314667696052534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}