{"id":"W2075626868","doi":"10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/35","title":"NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FOKKER-PLANCK EQUATION WITH ADIABATIC FOCUSING: ISOTROPIC PITCH-ANGLE SCATTERING","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Astrophysical Journal","topic":"Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Fokker–Planck equation; Adiabatic process; Isotropy; Numerical analysis; Diffusion; Distribution function; Numerical diffusion; Scattering; Classical mechanics; Pitch angle; Mathematical analysis; Statistical physics; Mechanics; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Differential equation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006828288,0.0003873278,0.0005000684,0.0004908967,0.0007482818,0.0006320803,0.0009360901,0.001298118,0.00230131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003652835,0.0002357657,0.0004481562,0.0005954621,0.001183096,0.0008300253,0.0007535876,0.0006877829,0.0001761388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00107375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00117421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01206533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004489152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997985,0.00004290665,0.00001561439,0.00002365895,0.00007933077,0.0000399733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987593,0.0006683578,0.0001663526,0.00008902119,0.0002484767,0.0000685429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004396388,0.00003650093,0.001206178,0.00006516497,0.00001899542,0.0001626818,0.0001141898,0.9528012,0.004411907,0.03757571,0.0004361802,0.003127293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001056786,0.000004571958,0.0001228741,0.000002921001,0.000002010493,0.00001330657,0.000008835452,0.9977705,0.0003840142,0.001515415,0.0001600224,0.000004978979],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5885586,0.0008958289,0.34895,0.002486252,0.000245246,0.0001770872,0.0003965691,0.0004562883,0.05783421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256949,0.000283637,0.06788708,0.0001851475,0.00005570164,0.000161033,0.0001792025,0.00008713896,0.005466036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01206533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02399021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007820810162353224,"score_gpt":0.2056356575044927,"score_spread":0.1978148473421395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}