{"id":"W2075626868","doi":"10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/35","title":"NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FOKKER-PLANCK EQUATION WITH ADIABATIC FOCUSING: ISOTROPIC PITCH-ANGLE SCATTERING","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Astrophysical Journal","topic":"Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Fokker–Planck equation; Adiabatic process; Isotropy; Numerical analysis; Diffusion; Distribution function; Numerical diffusion; Scattering; Classical mechanics; Pitch angle; Mathematical analysis; Statistical physics; Mechanics; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Differential equation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006961873,0.0001442036,0.0002792835,0.0000594101,0.0002593118,0.00012856,0.000331242,0.00001907637,0.0002016375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000639967,0.00007163769,0.0002869533,0.0005391671,0.0001092968,0.0001641706,0.00005153044,0.0003708859,0.00003462826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002988631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002326105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003784906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989531,0.0001100019,0.0002305713,0.0001225799,0.0003229778,0.0002607429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991497,0.0001099035,0.0002608789,0.0002956913,0.0001007314,0.00008303013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001163928,0.0006886339,0.6934196,0.00001479856,0.005592872,0.000003072846,0.001890725,0.1981327,0.04862234,0.01834795,0.0004583202,0.03271262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000723158,0.000219933,0.7075493,0.00005056604,0.0016644,0.000008537047,0.0006570668,0.2818677,0.001335238,0.005637525,0.00003559993,0.0002509723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8467678,0.000004286573,0.1520614,0.0007861019,0.00007201223,0.0001035166,0.000004816051,0.000005950154,0.000194199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980488,3.112703e-7,0.00150797,0.00003798208,0.0003133259,0.000008901107,0.000004999574,0.00001441354,0.00006327849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.151281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007820810162353224,"score_gpt":0.2056356575044927,"score_spread":0.1978148473421395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}