{"id":"W2075683753","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.05.008","title":"Validation study of the Chinese version of the Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Tianjin Science and Technology Committee","keywords":"Psychology; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Exploratory factor analysis; Confirmatory factor analysis; Intrusiveness; Test validity; Rating scale; Quality of life (healthcare); Scale (ratio); Construct validity; Goodness of fit; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Structural equation modeling; Psychotherapist","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007832935,0.0006482995,0.0008078095,0.001141181,0.001311678,0.0008767755,0.000813274,0.0004694123,0.002173901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01331201,0.0004118404,0.001022716,0.00094166,0.0009912938,0.0008073063,0.0009915078,0.001080997,0.0004817347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001397328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002903746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01206127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01846323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967122,0.001120077,0.0005338911,0.0003690762,0.001101214,0.0001636241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934719,0.002364383,0.0005773221,0.000571438,0.002739051,0.0002759028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001472865,0.001614244,0.8460642,0.0004931004,0.0008491344,0.000640913,0.02667172,0.0006047612,0.01550061,0.00273727,0.00337205,0.09997915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003682393,0.001037677,0.9834594,0.0001022788,0.0002737068,0.0006137231,0.004520941,0.002722306,0.002518067,0.0005037953,0.00378587,0.00009403414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952962,0.0002065066,0.00141613,0.0001383203,0.00009857213,0.0005387569,0.0003291873,0.00001014322,0.001966072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912849,0.0003021402,0.00443939,0.0001983978,0.0000511675,0.000873638,0.001075804,0.00002066341,0.001753779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01206127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04142499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04512414372294982,"score_gpt":0.4120005875526371,"score_spread":0.3668764438296873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}