{"id":"W2075784877","doi":"10.1002/joc.2141","title":"A systematic review and scientific critique of methodology in modern urban heat island literature","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Climatology","topic":"Urban Heat Island Mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":749,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scrutiny; Urban heat island; Sample (material); Observational study; Climatology; Scientific literature; Sample size determination; Geography; Environmental science; Meteorology; Political science; Medicine; Statistics; Geology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002030107,0.000231928,0.002335238,0.0004200191,0.00002222575,0.00004581443,0.000641198,0.0003609791,0.0001394622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001126975,0.0001657603,0.0002889526,0.0002331256,0.0003051172,0.0002217715,0.0001601816,0.0007415499,0.00001156995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001127993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008909126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000113079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001288966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964671,0.0009430243,0.001778057,0.0002654423,0.0003679108,0.0001784471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997729,0.000795402,0.001028987,0.0002226509,0.0001511709,0.00007280686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004767629,0.0003417573,0.002482539,0.9473828,0.000695551,0.0008260604,0.002020236,0.000005352063,0.0001557262,0.002735928,0.004419254,0.03888714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008577433,0.0001907973,0.00007121426,0.8167368,0.002970344,0.03149339,0.00003302994,0.0000738191,0.00001806197,0.005825979,0.1411801,0.0005486711],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003713969,0.9976243,0.0002700593,0.0002402658,0.0007693912,0.0005034044,0.00005594072,0.000002959132,0.0001622845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003722754,0.9980424,0.001207451,0.0001315218,0.00005024004,0.00002510409,0.00003154919,0.00001751062,0.0001219312],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1367609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6759509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04167231745139586,"score_gpt":0.3710542073789196,"score_spread":0.3293818899275238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}