{"id":"W2075784877","doi":"10.1002/joc.2141","title":"A systematic review and scientific critique of methodology in modern urban heat island literature","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Climatology","topic":"Urban Heat Island Mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":749,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scrutiny; Urban heat island; Sample (material); Observational study; Climatology; Scientific literature; Sample size determination; Geography; Environmental science; Meteorology; Political science; Medicine; Statistics; Geology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3698057,0.002074944,0.006546912,0.02115706,0.00240013,0.008642197,0.005484224,0.006770303,0.002290889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5986046,0.00238811,0.003771446,0.02689802,0.009927004,0.008281665,0.005123099,0.00310654,0.0005780091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01387481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04299362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005390739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009510966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5242618,0.353081,0.0603717,0.008352151,0.05240326,0.00153006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2513899,0.6438986,0.04333405,0.0146763,0.04568312,0.001017951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002914339,0.00005457805,0.002859255,0.6607563,0.005737473,0.000842499,0.01072256,0.001705791,0.0006546345,0.03680401,0.02887496,0.2506966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004753852,0.0002128625,0.003868083,0.8017775,0.008613423,0.0006655128,0.004664472,0.001349269,0.001016591,0.03930788,0.1379044,0.0001446452],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002225912,0.9467009,0.01548086,0.02829088,0.003120191,0.002257989,0.0002403928,0.00004990413,0.001632964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09155606,0.8084674,0.06313331,0.01782577,0.002625017,0.01462655,0.0003599621,0.00008240143,0.001323485],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6301943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7771417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04167231745139586,"score_gpt":0.3710542073789196,"score_spread":0.3293818899275238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}