{"id":"W2075865119","doi":"10.2134/agronj2009.0346","title":"Yield and Economic Assessments of Fertilizer Nitrogen and Phosphorus for Processing Tomato with Drip Fertigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agronomy Journal","topic":"Irrigation Practices and Water Management","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Ministry of Information Industry of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Fertigation; Fertilizer; Agronomy; Mathematics; Phosphorus; Yield (engineering); Nitrogen; Field experiment; Drip irrigation; Chemistry; Biology; Irrigation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001868339,0.00005902663,0.0000773858,0.000007812147,0.0001681982,0.0001577881,0.00005016122,0.00002687448,0.00006462423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004728879,0.00002239826,0.00001664116,0.00002047938,0.00003102495,0.0003737447,0.00001998671,0.00006986026,6.216964e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007187512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009962998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006086138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001188003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996143,0.00000753571,0.0001364548,0.00009859657,0.00004957677,0.00009355105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996877,0.0000407558,0.0001636932,0.00001661714,0.00003677781,0.00005442818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002513686,0.00006354666,0.4481719,0.00003039083,0.00007252536,0.000001478601,0.0002695543,0.00001058187,0.03957418,0.0007977972,0.0003292447,0.5104275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001018964,0.0008243971,0.9312242,0.00009157298,0.0001235134,0.0001254666,0.001658431,0.001433459,0.02619001,0.008348843,0.02862088,0.0003402855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984602,0.00007827929,0.0000829533,0.0008368157,0.00003846149,0.0001289779,0.000002196667,0.000004862853,0.0003672359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997562,0.00001675146,0.002216227,0.00006077042,0.00005970282,0.000008649756,0.000003525229,6.777763e-7,0.00007172432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5100872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1521555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0174056120598092,"score_gpt":0.243211421248394,"score_spread":0.2258058091885848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}