{"id":"W2076034436","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.010","title":"Scope conditions of economic voting: The Danish exception?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Scope (computer science); Danish; Economics; Positive economics; Generalizability theory; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00524516,0.0002129698,0.001014364,0.002088859,0.001801322,0.004303041,0.0009029338,0.001100679,0.008919072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02692463,0.0003111926,0.0006957206,0.002074137,0.00284831,0.003110113,0.003600358,0.0009412093,0.0005608965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002480733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002071587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0318548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04250072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947172,0.001308609,0.0007141722,0.001138239,0.0008747547,0.001247078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814207,0.0107801,0.00222819,0.002358165,0.001928154,0.00128464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001787174,0.0001991512,0.5221357,0.001066341,0.000448589,0.0009453789,0.008831179,0.005155612,0.002709511,0.3774057,0.007720868,0.07159473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001014762,0.0001258612,0.8833999,0.0003285943,0.0001768095,0.0004801589,0.01991514,0.002269626,0.00109696,0.07599407,0.0160413,0.00007017251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240507,0.004482356,0.001867861,0.003234815,0.0001558599,0.00002407596,0.00167484,0.00001603338,0.06449347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985572,0.0002803916,0.0001631603,0.00007407197,0.00001938751,0.000005963597,0.0001976538,0.000006228103,0.0006959543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0318548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06333876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08771620065684411,"score_gpt":0.4132340846454458,"score_spread":0.3255178839886017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}