{"id":"W2076034436","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.010","title":"Scope conditions of economic voting: The Danish exception?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Scope (computer science); Danish; Economics; Positive economics; Generalizability theory; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002648966,0.00006801295,0.0001520727,0.00001921495,0.0005903598,0.00004415051,0.0001165523,0.00003323896,0.0005756428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001778762,0.00004687562,0.00005124793,0.0001102957,0.0004140581,0.0001692171,0.00002402919,0.00006015273,0.0003455032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001202046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006363637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03882392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05350494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991049,0.0001727675,0.0002183361,0.0001014298,0.0001327805,0.0002697535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994002,0.0002286481,0.00009150757,0.00008030488,0.0001454928,0.00005384789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004542687,0.00006225276,0.4476826,0.00003373892,0.0001885493,2.966333e-7,0.003885914,0.0000459653,0.002583878,0.4231254,0.1212453,0.001141469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004676583,0.0003571086,0.8913262,0.0001142684,0.0001072872,9.53812e-7,0.002775449,0.00009703681,0.002849236,0.05252208,0.04886167,0.0005210633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899181,0.0008051039,0.00001221477,0.005571652,0.00032853,0.0003570668,0.000004722273,0.00004064304,0.00296197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979416,0.00001301169,0.000009212264,0.0000964983,0.0004080565,0.00008917532,0.000001975691,0.000005019348,0.001435482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4436435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9675766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08771620065684411,"score_gpt":0.4132340846454458,"score_spread":0.3255178839886017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}