{"id":"W2076060965","doi":"10.1080/09585192.2011.560881","title":"The effects of psychological contract violation on Chinese executives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Human Resource Management","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological contract; Psychology; Sample (material); Organizational commitment; China; Social psychology; Locus of control; Context (archaeology); Job satisfaction; Mainland China; Business; Public relations; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004776991,0.0001125954,0.0001192076,0.0001850474,0.0001930331,0.0001145149,0.0007292292,0.00002551541,0.0002298297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008737392,0.00005742433,0.000114598,0.0001316998,0.00008714441,0.0001924301,0.0001237313,0.0001545489,0.0000382584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003414472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002708141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001787649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007047116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987524,0.00003035388,0.0004044561,0.00009575462,0.0006149657,0.0001020712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988525,0.0001494583,0.000577427,0.0001524889,0.0002583284,0.000009801393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00138796,0.001120144,0.1712029,0.00006399971,0.0007731133,0.0001784092,0.001035289,0.0001121727,0.003410515,0.7727997,0.01042182,0.03749401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000949862,0.0000924968,0.9785795,0.00007957386,0.00007628043,0.000009945049,0.000404822,0.00001775895,0.0002394251,0.008779422,0.01068777,0.00008310699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692817,0.00007854443,0.0001210557,0.0007981738,0.0007178806,0.0002008005,5.43399e-7,0.0000162259,0.02878503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997941,0.0000259283,0.00003115498,0.001123895,0.0004933673,0.000004380836,0.000002765062,0.00001180795,0.0003657606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2516474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01741861805942619,"score_gpt":0.2802309931726579,"score_spread":0.2628123751132317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}