{"id":"W2076082197","doi":"10.1111/spol.12125","title":"<scp>J</scp>ack (and <scp>J</scp>ill?) of All Trades – A <scp>C</scp>anadian Case Study of Equity in Apprenticeship Supports","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Certification; Equity (law); Entry Level; Wage; Labour economics; Opportunity structures; Inequality; Barriers to entry; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Market structure; Sociology; Management; Industrial organization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001222452,0.0001660317,0.0001320901,0.0005949842,0.01096175,0.00327532,0.0007764727,0.001212424,0.01041869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001118489,0.0001253418,0.000166344,0.000600373,0.00341214,0.001178066,0.002652155,0.001377832,0.0005273329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005182625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07942829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1668722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998833,0.0004053939,0.0000226814,0.00007487756,0.0001448191,0.0005193792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989172,0.0002496611,0.00009191553,0.00007573286,0.0001548414,0.0005106509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003296433,0.002081759,0.1457947,0.0002640043,0.00002936804,0.02192584,0.2058879,0.002558908,0.003422263,0.3689924,0.04540369,0.2033096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005422682,0.0004334521,0.08888124,0.0004019168,0.00002296702,0.004607975,0.4519593,0.002047139,0.001633521,0.01091531,0.4390015,0.00004146113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7252862,0.0002911763,0.0007941584,0.004926099,0.00006908864,0.00007624819,0.00003874709,0.00001154592,0.2685067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977357,0.0001045829,0.0002606924,0.0002968669,0.00001191932,0.0000193576,0.00001187934,0.000003060262,0.02193478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9205717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1579319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09655272343790525,"score_gpt":0.4010204963199291,"score_spread":0.3044677728820239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}