{"id":"W2076083770","doi":"10.1037/a0037790","title":"Strategies and pseudoneglect on luminance judgments: An eye-tracking investigation.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Eye movement; Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Luminance; Attentional bias; Two-alternative forced choice; Eye tracking; Social psychology; Computer vision; Computer science; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002612995,0.0002457638,0.0002974494,0.0002028675,0.0005152503,0.0001003117,0.0002915738,0.0001073915,0.000124048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001638855,0.0002019797,0.0000684299,0.0001330947,0.0007147291,0.001590166,0.00002921381,0.0004293973,0.00004217996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004727739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001110704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002410161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001538707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982792,0.0002095637,0.0005199691,0.0004344282,0.0002727158,0.0002841909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991563,0.00002763415,0.0003980623,0.0002301363,0.00006042953,0.0001274306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001551033,0.000336275,0.008827531,0.000006104598,0.000004173741,0.000007262834,0.001580767,0.00001094243,0.9860178,0.0001993002,0.0004698666,0.002384936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001907915,0.008435849,0.5652777,0.0001130949,0.00002066685,0.0004185996,0.002470257,0.00007188702,0.4198777,0.0004930616,0.0005345696,0.0003787253],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972404,0.00007589084,0.00001917609,0.0004232104,0.0006393049,0.0001166904,9.533417e-7,0.000035507,0.001448848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957859,0.0001450635,0.000191166,0.003437859,0.0003120993,0.00001029999,0.000001366602,0.00001994608,0.0000962866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5661401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8236495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.145701734489544,"score_gpt":0.4359073121113945,"score_spread":0.2902055776218505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}