{"id":"W2076083770","doi":"10.1037/a0037790","title":"Strategies and pseudoneglect on luminance judgments: An eye-tracking investigation.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Eye movement; Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Luminance; Attentional bias; Two-alternative forced choice; Eye tracking; Social psychology; Computer vision; Computer science; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001132248,0.0002557717,0.0002166399,0.0002480635,0.0001570409,0.0004415346,0.0002035025,0.0004454283,0.0009354214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00988741,0.0001928247,0.0001407212,0.0001860133,0.0003735069,0.0007205873,0.0004048288,0.000395617,0.0000953839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003295568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002031196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005668668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00125515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994991,0.0001178828,0.00005396661,0.0001118936,0.0001872101,0.00002995861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942032,0.003334669,0.00141777,0.0005952903,0.0002945245,0.000154712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001874738,0.0004627831,0.08562019,0.0002148975,0.00007615512,0.0002486752,0.0007959014,0.0005736329,0.8837504,0.001015044,0.0001219155,0.02524566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008787497,0.00149712,0.8729015,0.00001773408,0.00005389618,0.0005911393,0.0002042328,0.007742041,0.1139578,0.002304885,0.0005995454,0.00004212851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967228,0.00006624954,0.002276935,0.00001833109,0.000004923537,0.00002417919,0.00003346868,0.00001426701,0.0008389968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981704,0.00003574702,0.001509507,0.00003268736,0.000002783064,0.00002408606,0.00004249386,0.00000760514,0.0001748358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001132248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005988002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.145701734489544,"score_gpt":0.4359073121113945,"score_spread":0.2902055776218505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}