{"id":"W2076164839","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2014-0338","title":"An approach for assessing suitability for forest management based on constraints of the physical environment at a regional scale","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Land use; Land management; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Land cover; Geography; Cartography; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002544097,0.0001338478,0.0001939335,0.0001841737,0.0003551205,0.00007174405,0.0007764982,0.00005610773,0.000138842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001229167,0.00009659513,0.0001856438,0.0002280942,0.00142444,0.0001943806,0.00008232225,0.0002062561,0.00001474135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001070252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003066389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001266074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008570837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978104,0.0001843653,0.0002876188,0.0002521017,0.0008623308,0.0006032339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984275,0.0001922556,0.0001527164,0.0004455328,0.000069022,0.0007129607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003152707,0.0004456521,0.8181211,0.0001173355,0.00003859893,0.00000901628,0.0006310535,0.1386327,0.00008739543,0.003840805,0.03235506,0.005405999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003273024,0.001473016,0.8286275,0.00009571043,0.00006572955,0.00001467286,0.0006818118,0.114742,0.0001607199,0.008965964,0.04158844,0.0003114403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851336,0.00001001517,0.00204904,0.001002865,0.00006931496,0.001149445,0.00004424618,0.000002425932,0.01053899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948856,8.726591e-7,0.004138863,0.00009444562,0.0001277794,0.00006212603,0.00001610175,0.00001883573,0.0006553968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0238907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.524841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09005408463788071,"score_gpt":0.3361619772482372,"score_spread":0.2461078926103564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}