{"id":"W2076294807","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03898.x","title":"Critical appraisal of rigour in interpretive phenomenological nursing research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"Nursing education and management","field":"Nursing","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Rigour; Critical appraisal; Nursing research; Psychology; Nursing; Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Epistemology; Medicine; Sociology; Qualitative research; Alternative medicine; Philosophy; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5461482,0.002733283,0.006139872,0.02427472,0.01133804,0.02374055,0.009054824,0.0101376,0.004447871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7677392,0.002248102,0.004186395,0.01250526,0.04141716,0.01880686,0.01413616,0.01364909,0.001153797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02164825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06645928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002118241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002714678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2448779,0.5873725,0.08281505,0.01123205,0.07082157,0.002880989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07442883,0.745271,0.03578015,0.02976745,0.112875,0.00187753],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006761124,0.0001403869,0.003159262,0.1012647,0.0009659322,0.002180882,0.3989549,0.0009333662,0.003276004,0.1779839,0.04202706,0.2684374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003471135,0.0004228198,0.003405531,0.2453795,0.0008978761,0.002469606,0.1385863,0.003207773,0.00521218,0.2041853,0.3952476,0.0006384479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02753683,0.2174497,0.4218142,0.1889484,0.04127485,0.05771687,0.0009836486,0.0009031668,0.04337227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3468702,0.06223631,0.451957,0.04128626,0.00873415,0.08314338,0.0004658817,0.0006689878,0.004637947],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4538518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5596801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09198741789298846,"score_gpt":0.5258530148837325,"score_spread":0.433865596990744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}