{"id":"W2076389556","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10","title":"The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2608,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Discriminant validity; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Extant taxon; Social psychology; Internal consistency; Convergent validity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Predictive validity; Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); External validity; Marketing; Developmental psychology; Business; Psychometrics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002631675,0.0002927037,0.0001845722,0.00109329,0.0007361622,0.001280992,0.000345544,0.0008505101,0.002903114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01396877,0.0003335639,0.0003394213,0.0007132466,0.0008454838,0.001213246,0.001622022,0.001164231,0.0003687532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004058658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002477159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007841756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001708758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985404,0.0006173718,0.0001256726,0.00008089911,0.0005195204,0.0001161476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912843,0.004103927,0.002266362,0.0005571277,0.00093781,0.0008505462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008445748,0.001718518,0.8069962,0.0003529789,0.0005045662,0.0003714636,0.02446533,0.0007148133,0.01803673,0.005275649,0.002770628,0.1379486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003358853,0.0005107507,0.9782382,0.00006393746,0.000136613,0.0003971257,0.01015085,0.001678862,0.002248826,0.003049333,0.003419052,0.000072731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861684,0.0001175225,0.001924019,0.000169638,0.00002876363,0.00007297196,0.00006670381,0.00001091302,0.01144098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950682,0.0001776006,0.003038051,0.0001239899,0.00002438719,0.00009053719,0.00010719,0.000005420215,0.001364587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002903114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0139178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05960238984683582,"score_gpt":0.3214164497709719,"score_spread":0.2618140599241361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}