{"id":"W2076404661","doi":"10.2118/171593-ms","title":"History-Matching and Forecasting Tight/Shale Gas Condensate Wells Using Combined Analytical, Semi-Analytical, and Empirical Methods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Petroleum engineering; Tight gas; Computer science; Shale gas; Revenue; Empirical research; Current (fluid); Matching (statistics); Oil shale; Operations research; Geology; Hydraulic fracturing; Engineering; Mathematics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009811784,0.000305443,0.0006620722,0.0002248118,0.0001571982,0.0001049285,0.0001289608,0.0001801745,0.0002797119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002389426,0.000251106,0.0001335185,0.0001833501,0.0001718593,0.0001501904,0.0001086477,0.0003759946,0.00001085683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001495098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002302392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002050476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002053963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982067,0.0001907255,0.0005028871,0.0004116788,0.0002289404,0.0004590951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984608,0.0007485791,0.00006258001,0.0003172658,0.00004957904,0.0003612128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001368483,0.0002516192,0.01970357,0.002024953,0.003559842,0.0001394049,0.003622248,0.8998621,0.0221245,0.003981633,0.01346336,0.03112996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003672699,0.00004440432,0.0003059511,0.00004303761,0.0002715623,0.00003275925,0.00006798848,0.9891549,0.0004896292,0.00080954,0.008069413,0.0003434944],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7989524,0.0004813358,0.1882285,0.0003178436,0.000133569,0.00008258738,0.000001299158,0.0002484703,0.01155401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662355,0.00004812738,0.03201311,0.0002566644,0.000105714,0.000002433704,0.000004251409,0.00005378042,0.00128041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1672831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05920316251193823,"score_gpt":0.3115970229859993,"score_spread":0.2523938604740611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}