{"id":"W2076470657","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2011.03.026","title":"On the robustness of maximum composite likelihood estimate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Robustness (evolution); Multivariate statistics; Likelihood function; Maximum likelihood; Quasi-maximum likelihood; Statistics; Marginal likelihood; Composite number; Consistency (knowledge bases); Applied mathematics; Econometrics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005846124,0.0001168345,0.0003380497,0.00004726077,0.00007001257,0.000016201,0.0001375432,0.00004367778,0.00007836297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002833518,0.00006697552,0.00003071883,0.00005312245,0.0001883129,0.00007311704,0.00003568194,0.0003144266,9.22278e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008307358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003096728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003283379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.413298e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989089,0.0001094791,0.0004871949,0.0000944088,0.0002278471,0.0001722026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938388,0.005419805,0.0003362023,0.0001088814,0.0001741446,0.0001221202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002756411,0.0001674977,0.0004129839,0.0001054763,0.00004667465,0.00006280115,0.0006832269,0.0003146,0.0001991767,0.9820791,0.0005058166,0.01514704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002725521,0.0005667906,0.002881458,0.00038525,0.00005949872,0.000046034,0.0001045142,0.01185642,0.000317691,0.9834082,0.00001067394,0.00009098134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06379966,0.00004531099,0.934594,0.00004626583,0.00008280441,0.00004953892,0.00004445281,0.000005820286,0.0013321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.514395,0.000007238014,0.4855433,0.00002716548,0.00001514503,7.641369e-7,3.564876e-7,0.000005921332,0.000005065893],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4505953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.339219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.166988026560952,"score_gpt":0.4196647308178981,"score_spread":0.252676704256946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}