{"id":"W2076610334","doi":"10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v31.i3.20","title":"Health Risks of Electromagnetic Fields. Part II: Evaluation and Assessment of Radio Frequency Radiation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","topic":"Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Institute of Population and Public Health; Health Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Radio frequency; Environmental health; Business; Medical physics; Engineering; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001907228,0.0002891942,0.001479598,0.0001179209,0.00002450587,0.000005745722,0.0001591976,0.000551249,0.00004382034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002691139,0.0002192663,0.0002246719,0.0002870157,0.0001403293,0.000003155434,0.00006347673,0.0004337881,3.930085e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005556538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003181614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000137371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000187029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997336,0.0004941019,0.001152852,0.0004135032,0.0002526352,0.0003508704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999074,0.0002220226,0.0002166783,0.0002751448,0.0000502979,0.0001618826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001239153,0.0001055089,0.00000460831,0.0132312,0.00002293528,0.000001085974,0.000003015476,7.810168e-7,0.0009356102,0.001055964,0.0001879446,0.9844501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005691123,0.0089124,0.0001261993,0.01520961,0.0003743567,0.0000532732,0.000001355064,0.0008022593,0.00007741287,0.000245353,0.9730857,0.0005429481],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004199552,0.9973273,0.0009451975,0.00009706983,0.0001728229,0.0009230225,0.00001298882,0.000004451967,0.00009714454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00270947,0.9925173,0.004244411,0.00005109462,0.0001066788,0.000172548,0.0001770258,0.00001671591,0.000004761829],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.894142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05888967230443283,"score_gpt":0.4204077656007962,"score_spread":0.3615180932963634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}