{"id":"W2076690329","doi":"10.1002/dei.77","title":"Theories of literacy development in limited English proficiency deaf people: a review","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Deafness & Education International","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sign language; Literacy; Psychology; Deaf education; Linguistics; American Sign Language; First language; Sociolinguistics of sign languages; Manually coded language; Pedagogy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001243866,0.0009982935,0.002020572,0.00527165,0.0004552892,0.001690978,0.001546957,0.001740429,0.003198022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003200796,0.0003864891,0.0005838606,0.005741456,0.001575836,0.002985546,0.001003297,0.001495317,0.0009851045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001277244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002906156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003609652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004621877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996402,0.00010849,0.00005623646,0.0000609844,0.0001104199,0.00002354088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979837,0.001575909,0.0001370367,0.00002286943,0.0002179102,0.0000624789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004678669,0.0001173081,0.001229584,0.04025847,0.0001293935,0.000529394,0.0009843182,0.0004834781,0.0002249699,0.01034472,0.0192156,0.9264359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004326065,0.0001986228,0.01011467,0.105813,0.0004505138,0.005046345,0.003015792,0.0003579555,0.0003220411,0.02518012,0.8493742,0.00008347858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000168762,0.9986078,0.000100925,0.000352613,0.00006878197,0.000003715351,0.000006548551,0.00000223942,0.000688583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008865034,0.9987484,0.0001116637,0.00009205675,0.00004165356,0.000005892516,0.000009024379,4.215826e-7,0.0001043147],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00527165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0106985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03928427612109679,"score_gpt":0.4278707910555203,"score_spread":0.3885865149344235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}