{"id":"W2076715122","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.006","title":"A Box-Cox Double-Hurdle model of wildlife valuation: The citizen's perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Wildlife; Contingent valuation; Valuation (finance); Payment; Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Wildlife conservation; Preference elicitation; Public economics; Preference; Economics; Public good; Marketing; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science; Ecology; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005944557,0.001147453,0.002869364,0.001336831,0.001076637,0.00589856,0.00350893,0.006318396,0.01026669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01627009,0.001159406,0.001610534,0.001895848,0.003778632,0.008427051,0.001734391,0.005075393,0.001045685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001997057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001920385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01115463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007382869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981652,0.001030254,0.00005450726,0.0002823837,0.0001882307,0.0002794723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990622,0.007114695,0.00060055,0.0003928712,0.0006194664,0.0006503745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001169397,0.00009511465,0.001677236,0.00008117545,0.00006457789,0.0004467189,0.0002147284,0.1600041,0.000149207,0.825816,0.005506384,0.00582786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006727216,0.00004365176,0.0004304008,0.00002755362,0.00003461438,0.000158129,0.0001371569,0.4182704,0.00005811646,0.5784464,0.002277767,0.00004854854],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1423113,0.005227489,0.7545913,0.03283904,0.000863899,0.0001449317,0.001191122,0.0003437849,0.06248714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144852,0.003669321,0.02073698,0.0009128534,0.0007851451,0.0001270995,0.0003174037,0.00007997698,0.05888608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01115463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03434551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1402295939631255,"score_gpt":0.2388407933036161,"score_spread":0.09861119934049059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}