{"id":"W2076767174","doi":"10.4018/jssci.2012070105","title":"Evaluating the Security Level of a Cryptosystem based on Chaos","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence","topic":"Cellular Automata and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptosystem; Computer science; Chaotic; Surrogate data; Attractor; Hybrid cryptosystem; Dimension (graph theory); Theoretical computer science; CHAOS (operating system); Paillier cryptosystem; Algorithm; Cryptography; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Nonlinear system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002411129,0.00009549606,0.000120134,0.0002641686,0.0001856322,0.0001594583,0.001700165,0.00002341977,0.00001244834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006576044,0.00006653537,0.00006895558,0.0005568597,0.0003278591,0.0007946421,0.000186317,0.0001487944,0.000009513788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008329302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004866588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001059151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.349938e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972571,0.00005825096,0.0004721572,0.0001635066,0.001878063,0.0001709367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965087,0.0006125332,0.0004702947,0.0001877421,0.002111926,0.0001088167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005546894,0.0005495521,0.003220473,0.0000289506,0.00006324482,0.000006989022,0.004084322,0.166995,0.002255692,0.4484172,0.0001608092,0.3741623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001531254,0.0002285078,0.01043368,0.000132282,0.000009021246,0.0001973727,0.0001777124,0.9504818,0.006614395,0.03113702,0.0003055345,0.0001295431],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05617904,0.0001310165,0.9415084,0.001447032,0.0005224437,0.00008933325,0.00001018324,0.00001338727,0.00009923432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433116,0.000006310279,0.05611653,0.0004445551,0.0001063052,0.000004531483,9.299e-7,0.000003068606,0.000006199986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3159357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1398345414593873,"score_gpt":0.3974886792284687,"score_spread":0.2576541377690814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}