{"id":"W2076767174","doi":"10.4018/jssci.2012070105","title":"Evaluating the Security Level of a Cryptosystem based on Chaos","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence","topic":"Cellular Automata and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptosystem; Computer science; Chaotic; Surrogate data; Attractor; Hybrid cryptosystem; Dimension (graph theory); Theoretical computer science; CHAOS (operating system); Paillier cryptosystem; Algorithm; Cryptography; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Nonlinear system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001452314,0.0005040656,0.0005368405,0.001224444,0.0004576201,0.0007631014,0.0004029939,0.0007400647,0.001216833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141893,0.0001382163,0.000311594,0.0004164415,0.001138222,0.001695286,0.0007647509,0.0005354931,0.0002144184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005693424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003375342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002122764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001538027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998275,0.0004280221,0.00014048,0.0001913653,0.0008160821,0.0001489961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913818,0.005473408,0.0009409224,0.0009995064,0.0009351394,0.0002691852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002757334,0.0004884714,0.03572399,0.0007960139,0.0003254722,0.0007390654,0.0005123963,0.1328138,0.6492427,0.03781004,0.0006693629,0.1381214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007390163,0.004378895,0.01497889,0.00007812509,0.00009161927,0.0009643202,0.0002018235,0.3692453,0.5981994,0.009613484,0.002049946,0.000124354],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658842,0.0003354456,0.1298812,0.00012002,0.00007334939,0.00009313042,0.0001286762,0.0002904202,0.003193526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870165,0.00007159874,0.01259164,0.00000695871,0.000006000821,0.00002002234,0.00005638102,0.00001399675,0.0002168101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001452314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007680655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1398345414593873,"score_gpt":0.3974886792284687,"score_spread":0.2576541377690814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}