{"id":"W2076820187","doi":"10.1353/cja.2005.0059","title":"Wheelchair Use Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a National Sample","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wheelchair; Logistic regression; Gerontology; Odds; Sample (material); Manual wheelchair; National Health Interview Survey; Medicine; Rehabilitation; Psychology; Physical therapy; Environmental health; Population; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003014472,0.0002427641,0.0002914897,0.0006206562,0.002425899,0.00005767911,0.0005007931,0.0002187033,0.000372682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003003023,0.0002422797,0.00006344096,0.0002759264,0.000254385,0.0002868992,0.00007274227,0.003017606,0.000009477764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00286425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007423728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2394936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9431344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965236,0.00162371,0.0006909202,0.0002759476,0.0001138868,0.0007719275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954846,0.00223559,0.0004156385,0.0005101367,0.0003659994,0.0009880173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008916571,0.00003468525,0.9793167,0.00007688513,0.0000287047,0.00001473616,0.01640505,0.0002291563,0.000001383968,0.001148459,0.0008376507,0.00189769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007105569,0.00004682059,0.934374,0.00160713,0.00001882829,0.00001504288,0.007324193,0.001078076,0.000003618326,0.0002092248,0.05437953,0.0002329225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947201,0.0002888331,0.0001922689,0.003253692,0.0002505809,0.000537613,0.0002309774,0.0000381247,0.0004877791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972948,0.0006745333,0.0006420652,0.000894008,0.0001046164,0.00007284684,0.00003492766,0.00002988677,0.0002523122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7036408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03602327201275395,"score_gpt":0.310812530397474,"score_spread":0.2747892583847201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}