{"id":"W2076848858","doi":"10.1071/bt09138","title":"Polyploidy and possible implications for the evolutionary history of some Australian Danthonieae","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Botany","topic":"Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"NSW Department of Primary Industries; Charles Sturt University; Univerzita Karlova v Praze","keywords":"Biology; Ploidy; Botany; Edaphic; Polyploid; Chromosome number; Plant genetics; Taxon; Paleobotany; Chromosome; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Karyotype; Gene; Plant development; Genetics; Genome","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005715442,0.0001780581,0.0003437691,0.001688359,0.001221452,0.0008145595,0.0006324255,0.000431481,0.002276368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001078244,0.0002246641,0.0001787,0.001282,0.001340619,0.0007523402,0.001032048,0.0003983596,0.0001931128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00118677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004643257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01081769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02617454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997481,0.00005857217,0.00002237732,0.00009059955,0.00004378706,0.0000366065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999495,0.0001427007,0.0001396767,0.00004750057,0.00007550586,0.00009962421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005807721,0.0001049076,0.6489405,0.000690994,0.0001614158,0.002379554,0.03576601,0.0009707013,0.2152506,0.004772713,0.0001706183,0.09021109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007124044,0.00007075123,0.9932893,0.00002444342,0.00001745821,0.0005084391,0.002300461,0.0003394906,0.0002914226,0.0008947756,0.00223798,0.00001838455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976885,0.0004930419,0.0001975591,0.00008651648,0.000001893921,0.000005822803,0.00003467741,0.000002630966,0.001489274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984609,0.0003531734,0.0003587376,0.00003662809,0.000003383897,0.00000790168,0.00007614361,0.000002631298,0.0007005589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01081769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02150941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04364848086079885,"score_gpt":0.2419365894311511,"score_spread":0.1982881085703522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}