{"id":"W2076848858","doi":"10.1071/bt09138","title":"Polyploidy and possible implications for the evolutionary history of some Australian Danthonieae","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Botany","topic":"Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"NSW Department of Primary Industries; Charles Sturt University; Univerzita Karlova v Praze","keywords":"Biology; Ploidy; Botany; Edaphic; Polyploid; Chromosome number; Plant genetics; Taxon; Paleobotany; Chromosome; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Karyotype; Gene; Plant development; Genetics; Genome","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002327679,0.00008499583,0.000140203,0.00001337368,0.000108312,0.00001435042,0.0002680604,0.00007925134,0.00009908076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003614658,0.00003203861,0.0001065103,0.00006669141,0.0001861113,0.0001154267,0.00001765621,0.0001894613,0.000001200002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002180991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003759505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008426145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993459,0.00002323619,0.0002950427,0.00008869793,0.00008326809,0.0001638833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991942,0.0002546279,0.0002792281,0.00005859511,0.0001040729,0.0001092869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003817012,0.00005214459,0.02433234,0.000005075856,0.00003381085,0.000001298906,0.00004128969,0.000002514342,0.9447692,0.001290778,0.01948215,0.009951206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001340124,0.000249389,0.7376106,0.00001329423,0.00004931986,0.0002021064,0.00009917268,0.00000314228,0.003193422,0.001829807,0.2565282,0.00008753097],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902349,0.0007700154,0.000004896999,0.008191894,0.0004368509,0.0001257266,0.0001696123,0.000004140225,0.00006203825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967235,0.0001211062,0.0008650529,0.00007348553,0.0004074048,0.000003907403,0.000003312311,8.032764e-7,0.001801399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1306497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04364848086079885,"score_gpt":0.2419365894311511,"score_spread":0.1982881085703522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}