{"id":"W2076880984","doi":"10.1139/l01-066","title":"Rehabilitation of bridges using aluminum decks","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Geotechnical and construction materials studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Rehabilitation; Deck; Christian ministry; Bridge deck; Engineering; Transport engineering; Structural engineering; Civil engineering; Computer science; Forensic engineering; Physical therapy; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003995956,0.0002865564,0.0002242444,0.0008153497,0.0003289199,0.0003876969,0.0004173484,0.0002771668,0.001626153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005845579,0.0001018948,0.0002073579,0.000498528,0.0002421049,0.0004954788,0.0003255593,0.0001727853,0.0003619622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003201942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002528216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009467116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004125604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997625,0.00004007018,0.00001706882,0.00002002251,0.0001308272,0.00002947574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998337,0.00003398915,0.00003525479,0.00002565317,0.00006136858,0.000009922945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001202482,0.0007481896,0.02510891,0.000808235,0.00007755535,0.001085614,0.0004300808,0.1643169,0.364811,0.005815589,0.001504961,0.4340905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002107596,0.009710852,0.1478059,0.0002717032,0.0002266256,0.005065737,0.002069884,0.3162296,0.4738667,0.006694921,0.03775201,0.00009533986],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713656,0.0004119825,0.02273447,0.00006105497,0.00001752612,0.00003990073,0.00004477799,0.00005049007,0.005274266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982961,0.0002773982,0.01394094,0.00001065474,0.000004347208,0.00001172064,0.00005433988,0.00001009924,0.002729594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001626153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005440056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008050059117609039,"score_gpt":0.1814174916937924,"score_spread":0.1733674325761834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}