{"id":"W2077084044","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.830.353","title":"Response of Carbon Sink Dynamic Behaviors to River Flood in Karst Area – A Case Study in the Li River of Guilin","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced materials research","topic":"Karst Systems and Hydrogeology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of General Surgeons","funders":"","keywords":"Karst; Carbon sink; Sink (geography); Hydrology (agriculture); Flood myth; Environmental science; Surface runoff; Floodplain; Carbon dioxide; Geology; Climate change; Chemistry; Ecology; Geography; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002506731,0.0002031936,0.0002032025,0.0005908314,0.0005767057,0.0004929568,0.000382363,0.0005470208,0.0008171125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000374719,0.0001601413,0.000290385,0.0007210764,0.0004344091,0.0004076821,0.0003658037,0.000232654,0.00006599157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009838055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004352958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04885034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998741,0.00002335074,0.000007449358,0.00003332858,0.00002104829,0.000040725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997625,0.00007698176,0.00004748501,0.00001610696,0.00004987818,0.00004701018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003963713,0.000432713,0.9363635,0.0001113555,0.0001218119,0.01290911,0.003334493,0.02029127,0.01050014,0.0005839481,0.001158556,0.01379677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001341003,0.0001228489,0.961241,0.000009558633,0.00004247761,0.0004685408,0.005022272,0.03060719,0.001328949,0.0002355082,0.0008778785,0.00003035718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994327,0.00001454886,0.0001095307,0.00002715707,9.381048e-7,0.000005209743,0.0001124504,0.000007122199,0.0002902171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993616,0.00002090909,0.0001753076,0.000006914077,0.000001916587,0.000005323645,0.0001300287,0.000002236746,0.0002958137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04885034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09713203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03924853872942757,"score_gpt":0.3359001354487574,"score_spread":0.2966515967193298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}