{"id":"W2077248744","doi":"10.1017/s0890060415000025","title":"Using analogies to explain versus inspire concepts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Analogy; Parallels; Concreteness; Analogical reasoning; Psychology; Process (computing); Mathematics education; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001459166,0.0001280473,0.0002061972,0.0004338298,0.0003665471,0.0002255181,0.0002082654,0.00006498447,0.0000409677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008868302,0.0001312305,0.00009184677,0.0006404167,0.00008577004,0.0002340222,0.00003115507,0.00007428107,0.00001180337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001234962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001504266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009844358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987555,0.00007076682,0.0002594233,0.0002957924,0.0002462883,0.0003722419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989465,0.0004249249,0.00005632936,0.0001422628,0.00009525283,0.0003347034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009343036,0.0000301834,0.0001139815,0.00000741536,0.0001880675,0.000001955423,0.02929211,0.8768768,0.0008393601,0.03347849,0.0001395475,0.05893863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002211436,0.0004826982,0.0004837523,0.00005027249,0.0009029906,0.000001516562,0.1555119,0.5608059,0.2158647,0.01037578,0.05376727,0.001532003],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1535833,0.00005767777,0.8447626,0.0004671287,0.0006584218,0.0002184593,0.00000238768,0.00007421339,0.0001758269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687252,0.00001654295,0.03084139,0.0000589515,0.0002584938,0.00002518923,0.000002759022,0.000008845543,0.00006264762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5351424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3880093503757162,"score_gpt":0.4554113850577344,"score_spread":0.06740203468201822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}