{"id":"W2077262353","doi":"10.1586/14737167.2014.894464","title":"Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Scope (computer science); Health technology; Normative; Context (archaeology); Management science; Identification (biology); Ethical issues; Computer science; Knowledge management; Political science; Health care; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4563454,0.003317488,0.01201031,0.03860132,0.004336679,0.0116095,0.006883233,0.009905379,0.008308212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6685165,0.003836958,0.01447558,0.03098318,0.006916335,0.01253015,0.008938821,0.007899462,0.002081236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01511151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09827562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005043691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01061694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3884469,0.3754812,0.1752143,0.006872353,0.0518204,0.00216492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.298485,0.5039904,0.08798658,0.02863336,0.07787365,0.003030977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003403568,0.0001030642,0.001044653,0.7544844,0.003959463,0.0002119918,0.002837121,0.0006311138,0.0003830963,0.01225389,0.01893732,0.2048136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006818282,0.0001308953,0.001046079,0.9076127,0.006235444,0.0002139393,0.001101896,0.0004969627,0.000463121,0.01147189,0.0704211,0.0001241158],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002525639,0.7194423,0.09385432,0.02801719,0.004777523,0.1382569,0.006050764,0.0004902973,0.006585039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02508006,0.3310593,0.3236136,0.008580558,0.0009592109,0.3058403,0.003620573,0.0001954618,0.001050918],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5436546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6704229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7531599666848515,"score_gpt":0.7561822659407604,"score_spread":0.003022299255908911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}