{"id":"W2077262353","doi":"10.1586/14737167.2014.894464","title":"Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Scope (computer science); Health technology; Normative; Context (archaeology); Management science; Identification (biology); Ethical issues; Computer science; Knowledge management; Political science; Health care; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3715084,0.0007352963,0.02018502,0.00204053,0.0002210916,0.00005570117,0.00146858,0.000826384,0.001093983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1075801,0.0007104299,0.001598031,0.0009721766,0.0003684062,0.0002740982,0.0003622555,0.001877454,0.0002594706],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00391709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003885693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000213965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003418383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9332985,0.03013335,0.03256527,0.00188562,0.0008477485,0.00126956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9502178,0.02941526,0.01670546,0.002089726,0.001247693,0.0003240868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001691866,0.0001379854,0.00002929947,0.908013,0.0003996091,3.189211e-7,0.00007413669,0.000004686223,6.064189e-8,0.06551485,0.02145898,0.004365389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009378796,0.0001122805,0.000003275408,0.6140274,0.0002534245,0.00001141996,0.00006462988,0.0005583952,3.718983e-7,0.007650581,0.3759483,0.0004321084],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011447,0.9176522,0.000798308,0.05609681,0.000490999,0.02403264,0.000476362,0.00002697585,0.0004245861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001178502,0.9470807,0.01417768,0.0232263,0.000127167,0.01498281,0.0002034665,0.00009903048,0.00009101906],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3544893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7531599666848515,"score_gpt":0.7561822659407604,"score_spread":0.003022299255908911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}