{"id":"W2077445933","doi":"10.1016/j.jmr.2008.03.008","title":"Capillary scale NMR flow mapping","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance","topic":"NMR spectroscopy and applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Capillary action; Flow (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Visualization; Sample (material); Volumetric flow rate; Flow visualization; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Work flow; Sampling (signal processing); Chemistry; Materials science; Mechanics; Computer science; Chromatography; Physics; Data mining; Optics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000288566,0.0003832017,0.000286043,0.0006852487,0.0006124784,0.0009151991,0.0005282736,0.0007721474,0.00805683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005608692,0.0002400688,0.0001443628,0.0004389104,0.0006967803,0.001077755,0.0006410033,0.0009574941,0.001370263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000622488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004478231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001311971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002048869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998114,0.00002367365,0.000005051099,0.00007121301,0.00005210099,0.00003665277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997147,0.0001110215,0.00002732926,0.0000402834,0.00006835018,0.00003835915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008960839,0.00003982868,0.0002844991,0.0000770814,0.000008784484,0.00007897528,0.00003938938,0.0003388026,0.9737222,0.005196372,0.001853653,0.01827071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002270966,0.00008752446,0.001587018,0.00001362281,0.00001358207,0.0003141769,0.0000391022,0.01783634,0.967003,0.001546458,0.01150714,0.00002933363],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4891824,0.002979475,0.4328069,0.001791692,0.0004657012,0.0003886329,0.001605884,0.003906981,0.06687219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8315645,0.001424383,0.1413788,0.000602458,0.0002034348,0.000224294,0.0006338769,0.0003091874,0.02365904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00805683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02695274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01055256581940763,"score_gpt":0.2640578557518377,"score_spread":0.2535052899324301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}