{"id":"W2077594928","doi":"10.1515/crelle.2006.058","title":"Mild pro-p-groups and Galois groups of p-extensions of ℚ","year":2006,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal)","topic":"Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohomological dimension; Mathematics; Galois group; Class (philosophy); Group (periodic table); Galois module; Dimension (graph theory); Finitely-generated abelian group; Extension (predicate logic); Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Physics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003354898,0.0009809871,0.002791554,0.001012388,0.0009388379,0.0002140048,0.0009064024,0.0008645343,0.0008249778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001123201,0.0007710633,0.001091904,0.0005410438,0.001299046,0.0004306173,0.0004015557,0.002511315,0.00005259395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001781343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004055711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005137671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007370965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919491,0.0008699058,0.004251267,0.0005678713,0.00117219,0.001189603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905024,0.001794008,0.005128253,0.0008449068,0.001132098,0.000598344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00365828,0.01499387,0.00739117,0.01325576,0.01754579,0.009373004,0.02546589,0.000318943,0.05838729,0.735038,0.1000495,0.01452241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005899646,0.00238158,0.000902071,0.005117923,0.004691338,0.01759174,0.00301801,0.0003921341,0.02277061,0.9216393,0.01437897,0.001216683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8164044,0.1658251,0.006875544,0.004018807,0.001970716,0.0008003249,0.0001144937,0.00005519901,0.003935371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042409,0.06499083,0.02232058,0.0001821839,0.003796505,0.00001572288,0.00001845521,0.0002734837,0.004161306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1866013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02354019067049471,"score_gpt":0.2989266994864207,"score_spread":0.275386508815926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}