{"id":"W2077802958","doi":"10.1103/physrevlett.91.198103","title":"Percolation Theory for the Distribution and Abundance of Species","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review Letters","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Percolation theory; Relative abundance distribution; Percolation (cognitive psychology); Species distribution; Statistical physics; Population; Spatial distribution; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Relative species abundance; Ecology; Physics; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001846202,0.001113919,0.001258131,0.002631702,0.001186622,0.002166278,0.002591355,0.002302232,0.004244188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01337743,0.0004642785,0.001446605,0.002572324,0.003275828,0.005515307,0.001409725,0.002712768,0.001252462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002369855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001229352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003784828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002218451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998827,0.0003409423,0.00005255432,0.0002053954,0.0004413264,0.000132849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955266,0.003206869,0.0003823044,0.0003664166,0.0003563625,0.0001614095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001007893,0.00001289652,0.0004442008,0.0000870876,0.00003069138,0.00007970319,0.00009035147,0.08100561,0.0003459479,0.9041649,0.004512504,0.009216154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008450407,0.000008091628,0.0002337367,0.00002201768,0.000008360037,0.0001019289,0.00001315573,0.1219113,0.00007851749,0.8724197,0.00517991,0.00001488724],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01559362,0.004414649,0.9529833,0.003680813,0.0005527046,0.00006838506,0.000598583,0.0004800712,0.02162781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7474092,0.01438164,0.2129361,0.001885683,0.002338362,0.0008535561,0.001161362,0.0004215403,0.01861252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004244188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01719457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00715796736123193,"score_gpt":0.2373870825810779,"score_spread":0.230229115219846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}