{"id":"W2077862869","doi":"10.7326/0003-4819-132-12-200006200-00007","title":"The Quality of Reporting in Published Cost-Utility Analyses, 1976–1997","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Internal Medicine","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Psychological intervention; Cost–utility analysis; Quality-adjusted life year; Actuarial science; Audit; MEDLINE; Cost–benefit analysis; Health economics; Family medicine; Cost effectiveness; Public health; Accounting; Nursing; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07229586,0.0001580452,0.001541579,0.0002781365,0.00007030047,0.00002176008,0.000492114,0.00009910757,0.002184348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05137007,0.0001328891,0.0001956748,0.0003588683,0.0003083928,0.0003292158,0.00004370211,0.0002685517,0.00006683092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007899415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009100292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02308061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001599177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9835399,0.0005708083,0.01488971,0.0004117997,0.0002229887,0.0003648098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852937,0.002483123,0.01102964,0.0007829613,0.0002615691,0.0001490165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003895707,0.0002818801,0.8677447,0.0007379112,0.000306292,0.000005667795,0.003038858,0.00009369943,0.00005480878,0.024513,0.089357,0.01347665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001362033,0.0002512206,0.8878312,0.0008347557,0.000008598938,0.000007806643,0.001712476,0.002587172,0.0003147307,0.02943335,0.07540508,0.0002515422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8905414,0.006256831,0.0002958821,0.07441092,0.0003810569,0.0004473719,0.0001045358,0.00001530427,0.02754672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923739,0.0006409238,0.0001161863,0.005814796,0.000221787,0.00002566949,0.0000174428,0.00001219749,0.0007770457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1018326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7144303379099629,"score_gpt":0.5810989880857623,"score_spread":0.1333313498242006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}