{"id":"W2077862869","doi":"10.7326/0003-4819-132-12-200006200-00007","title":"The Quality of Reporting in Published Cost-Utility Analyses, 1976–1997","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Internal Medicine","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Psychological intervention; Cost–utility analysis; Quality-adjusted life year; Actuarial science; Audit; MEDLINE; Cost–benefit analysis; Health economics; Family medicine; Cost effectiveness; Public health; Accounting; Nursing; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4622216,0.00156225,0.004364334,0.05616177,0.001965062,0.012042,0.005612543,0.002302086,0.003802629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7992737,0.002491412,0.005745511,0.1033649,0.005200287,0.007297888,0.004925331,0.003528376,0.0009307611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02117869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02840741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01678365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01007744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2686806,0.226072,0.4096326,0.009413028,0.08433048,0.001871304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08471014,0.5486277,0.195614,0.0338246,0.1361128,0.00111086],"domain_codex":"reporting","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":"reporting","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003692565,0.0001343075,0.1055464,0.3131561,0.009982417,0.0008451337,0.01505194,0.001722306,0.001291366,0.0107136,0.0790379,0.458826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001722059,0.0006530023,0.2260197,0.4021508,0.01380159,0.002472815,0.007964169,0.002533533,0.005151198,0.01102697,0.3257543,0.000749868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0505298,0.7516509,0.04668372,0.02915495,0.006672244,0.02008498,0.07523528,0.0005106324,0.01947748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3557409,0.391683,0.1125024,0.01097907,0.002867303,0.06847379,0.05441673,0.0009842209,0.002352525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5377784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6631765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7144303379099629,"score_gpt":0.5810989880857623,"score_spread":0.1333313498242006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}