{"id":"W2077874370","doi":"10.2753/mis0742-1222300303","title":"The Governance and Control of Open Source Software Projects","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Information Systems","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Open-source software development; Project governance; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Control (management); Variety (cybernetics); Business; Set (abstract data type); Best practice; Process management; Software; Software development; Computer science; Management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00136201,0.0000799647,0.0001781317,0.0001049045,0.0001966093,0.002061695,0.001434823,0.00002421683,0.000002548107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001173341,0.00005164424,0.00003302157,0.0003614924,0.0000410498,0.006124319,0.0004016958,0.00009266219,0.00002840971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000444203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004843387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006042273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.710506e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983663,0.00006380965,0.0008866554,0.00005387432,0.0005032862,0.0001260523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971464,0.0001594139,0.00168999,0.0003126437,0.0006521593,0.00003942887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004342377,0.00007655807,0.0100012,0.0006280019,0.0005163863,0.000003792772,0.006278428,0.005283658,0.00001929889,0.362706,0.07439523,0.5400481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003295515,0.0002859705,0.04402361,0.0005962877,0.00004001031,0.0001503153,0.005117621,0.03003173,0.00005346271,0.001066603,0.9150401,0.0002988093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004359895,0.0001635133,0.989399,0.001405652,0.0004229788,0.001111392,0.000002172856,0.0000222396,0.003113221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880836,0.00004719731,0.01083254,0.000328866,0.00003279047,0.00004533291,5.145309e-7,0.000004232523,0.0006249551],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01172494259097287,"score_gpt":0.2301541066535531,"score_spread":0.2184291640625802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}