{"id":"W2077883933","doi":"10.1100/tsw.2001.346","title":"Sampling Ozone Exposure of Canadian Forests at Different Scales: Some Case Studies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Scientific World JOURNAL","topic":"Plant responses to elevated CO2","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Environmental science; Ozone; Atmospheric sciences; Pollutant; Tree canopy; Ground Level Ozone; Sampling (signal processing); Air pollution; Canopy; Understory; Spatial variability; Physical geography; Meteorology; Ecology; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009893401,0.0001476174,0.0002098561,0.0001962417,0.001849392,0.0002144258,0.0004538684,0.00003503096,0.0003524765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001169917,0.00004374297,0.0001248908,0.001252111,0.0003558101,0.000137893,0.0001133186,0.0002416566,0.00003436544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001478708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002218756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7706332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983581,0.0001741225,0.0003400447,0.0002185947,0.000392561,0.0005165389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988582,0.0004198537,0.0001848774,0.000111521,0.0001557001,0.0002698383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004990537,0.0002343617,0.08703571,0.00002433071,0.0003515812,0.005769442,0.002186181,0.0003567654,0.7606239,0.000888731,0.04219876,0.09983114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001184694,0.0006109288,0.6440682,0.0005825471,0.0002298321,0.07199351,0.006472116,0.0002474819,0.01987345,0.01107077,0.2424356,0.001230883],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931753,0.002237502,4.393796e-7,0.003451693,0.0007886866,0.0001200814,0.00006400837,0.00001543542,0.0001468128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907089,0.0002478124,0.00001453117,0.00008063937,0.0002899535,0.000003054488,0.00001051338,0.000001067118,0.008643488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7684145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06066119557277249,"score_gpt":0.2612660563880611,"score_spread":0.2006048608152886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}