{"id":"W2077883933","doi":"10.1100/tsw.2001.346","title":"Sampling Ozone Exposure of Canadian Forests at Different Scales: Some Case Studies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Scientific World JOURNAL","topic":"Plant responses to elevated CO2","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Environmental science; Ozone; Atmospheric sciences; Pollutant; Tree canopy; Ground Level Ozone; Sampling (signal processing); Air pollution; Canopy; Understory; Spatial variability; Physical geography; Meteorology; Ecology; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001908257,0.000669905,0.000504706,0.001085887,0.004960145,0.0007745516,0.00129533,0.001010529,0.0003641645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002254847,0.0002874926,0.000612966,0.002988686,0.001004004,0.0003008363,0.0006894568,0.0005029999,0.00004279082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0172816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007173529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9545027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9840885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979645,0.0003511846,0.0000774658,0.000286826,0.0007861014,0.0005339205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982587,0.0004526174,0.0001589609,0.0001053509,0.0008170942,0.0002073205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001039559,0.001402167,0.8168918,0.0007653519,0.0003185986,0.01228921,0.0130461,0.009266254,0.01606516,0.00113548,0.001492044,0.1262882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005767305,0.001042223,0.9624584,0.00006072522,0.0002809446,0.00318462,0.01044046,0.006446713,0.007173504,0.0003716204,0.008374504,0.0001086219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950076,0.0008189834,0.0009356572,0.0001466287,0.000004931432,0.0001698768,0.0002259661,0.00001926242,0.00267109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922107,0.001166992,0.004882865,0.000127856,0.000009841243,0.00006032179,0.0002619047,0.000007586007,0.001271945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0454973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1253874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06066119557277249,"score_gpt":0.2612660563880611,"score_spread":0.2006048608152886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}