{"id":"W2077926906","doi":"10.1161/circoutcomes.108.790634","title":"Primer on Statistical Interpretation or Methods Report Card on Propensity-Score Matching in the Cardiology Literature From 2004 to 2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Propensity score matching; Matching (statistics); Medicine; Internal medicine; Covariate; Cardiology; Statistics; Mathematics; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1325668,0.002363956,0.00224858,0.0176045,0.001686242,0.009100324,0.004747741,0.005215302,0.07901495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5109758,0.001894582,0.004700697,0.01890344,0.00324357,0.006208728,0.006971645,0.008370719,0.023884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003132779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01711714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002341296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001488914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8662047,0.08985566,0.02471355,0.004733603,0.01319897,0.001293473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.437093,0.430548,0.03855151,0.02534154,0.06479496,0.003671098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000374175,0.00008863236,0.00169847,0.009391955,0.0002660717,0.0001493944,0.0005532137,0.0005654707,0.0003136676,0.03635756,0.7337617,0.2164798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003996445,0.0001259465,0.002733161,0.01644429,0.0002727324,0.0003650229,0.0003570248,0.00213148,0.0008227837,0.0529255,0.9233149,0.0001073498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001069598,0.03123147,0.5573363,0.2119291,0.1037423,0.01459556,0.04220005,0.005933865,0.0319618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008664384,0.02971538,0.7466767,0.08284666,0.02856574,0.056089,0.01795457,0.003463294,0.02602437],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7010885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.411483653051555,"score_gpt":0.5222492141402588,"score_spread":0.1107655610887038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}