{"id":"W2078037087","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.002","title":"Animal welfare perspectives on recreational angling","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Natural Environment Research Council; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Fishing; Recreation; Catch and release; Animal welfare; Premise; Welfare; Perspective (graphical); Recreational fishing; Psychology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003090075,0.0004501475,0.0003078704,0.0009471772,0.00263332,0.003389157,0.001134499,0.004614189,0.009385933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00317163,0.0001724295,0.0003291973,0.0007696068,0.008872156,0.001362301,0.001960716,0.002407058,0.0007732449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001555416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001338389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007975528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02620749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977259,0.001577625,0.00004807142,0.0001502502,0.0002313055,0.0002668375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965481,0.001956705,0.0003981724,0.0001401233,0.0006033881,0.0003535493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001350066,0.0009272399,0.05178906,0.001971712,0.0001522541,0.009038858,0.05431187,0.001073269,0.02019268,0.5430636,0.08815711,0.2279723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006918369,0.001613582,0.1328257,0.002671024,0.0001194684,0.004758451,0.09695194,0.000399212,0.004442777,0.08802874,0.668022,0.00009790242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2521016,0.05840324,0.005215752,0.2793938,0.005570628,0.00004528893,0.0003498642,0.00005056943,0.3988692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8763095,0.03025955,0.002144151,0.05253914,0.006662098,0.0001440955,0.0001242177,0.00005871369,0.03175846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009385933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03139913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0325082670607687,"score_gpt":0.3136476346714435,"score_spread":0.2811393676106748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}