{"id":"W2078053881","doi":"10.6000/1927-5951.2011.01.01.11","title":"Detection of Outliers in Bioequivalence Studies Data Analysis with Williams Design","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outlier; Exploratory analysis; Computer science; Protocol (science); Anomaly detection; Inclusion (mineral); Statistical analysis; Econometrics; Statistics; Data mining; Data science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Mathematics; Social psychology; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001965378,0.00005715335,0.0002482159,0.0002624606,0.0000592152,0.000008501096,0.0001700416,0.00000983362,0.000006451087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004043665,0.00003580778,0.00002387683,0.0005885757,0.0003495972,0.0005548802,0.0000282173,0.00007218637,4.530086e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009040045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002157156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007188125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001032869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999087,0.0001397062,0.0003406174,0.0001223045,0.0002238751,0.00008648448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998839,0.0005677916,0.0003358452,0.00007372961,0.0001410067,0.00004267526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01713823,0.009038528,0.08147556,0.004870806,0.005602167,0.0005260102,0.03895223,0.002078378,0.2444327,0.0575414,0.0005554601,0.5377886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004044134,0.002471584,0.00134669,0.0005971296,0.001856261,0.0001089075,0.0098083,0.03723964,0.1348832,0.8071996,0.0001171222,0.000327488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1587804,0.001129726,0.8399178,0.00004281135,0.00003546896,0.00006662503,0.000007986215,0.000002075569,0.00001710587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5815135,0.001508294,0.416957,0.000007512864,0.000009763901,0.00000107372,6.330892e-8,0.000001165452,0.000001666842],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7496582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1460199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6574779405632412,"score_gpt":0.5428266837907908,"score_spread":0.1146512567724504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}