{"id":"W2078078687","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2013-0072","title":"Evaluating analytical approaches for estimating pelagic fish biomass using simulated fish communities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Great Lakes Fishery Commission","keywords":"Pelagic zone; Trawling; Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishing; Water column; Range (aeronautics); Apportionment; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01305435,0.00119708,0.0006163336,0.001946108,0.0007358137,0.0009438085,0.001928157,0.001015584,0.0008384965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0488938,0.0009478809,0.00100777,0.001213375,0.0006632879,0.001540191,0.001355189,0.0007522894,0.0001422036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003751521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002830876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04982862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03473896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968786,0.001797828,0.0002215256,0.0003606105,0.000577876,0.0001635444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486219,0.04262218,0.002921472,0.001419005,0.003976156,0.0004392519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004209373,0.0002510058,0.03447207,0.0001698118,0.0002677654,0.00005845341,0.0003178986,0.9303971,0.00142069,0.00157229,0.0001355591,0.03051648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004736136,0.0001830308,0.004395591,0.00002950948,0.00004424734,0.00001989464,0.0001173481,0.9930924,0.0007575856,0.001169472,0.0001237277,0.00001976063],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8434737,0.0003457654,0.1536892,0.0001329077,0.00001833149,0.0003500915,0.0002016449,0.000309312,0.001478981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8937771,0.0001984512,0.105097,0.00004402763,0.00000719339,0.0004171382,0.0001801382,0.00004201058,0.0002369727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04982862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09907717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1329105945708768,"score_gpt":0.2952256585035639,"score_spread":0.1623150639326871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}