{"id":"W2078121532","doi":"10.1016/j.ejc.2012.02.004","title":"On a bijective proof of a factorization formula for Macdonald polynomials","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Combinatorics","topic":"Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Factorization; Combinatorics; Bijection; Combinatorial proof; Symmetric function; Macdonald polynomials; Pure mathematics; Orthogonal polynomials; Classical orthogonal polynomials","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002012037,0.0002393817,0.000580212,0.0002442736,0.00007706236,0.00001983535,0.0003800666,0.00005308189,0.00001530952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004082566,0.0002002732,0.000258183,0.0002985668,0.00004170541,0.0003483788,0.00006432238,0.000257205,0.000005519837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001758565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006891622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.21871e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.612827e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976191,0.000302928,0.001088753,0.000110836,0.0005464111,0.0003319845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953053,0.001555181,0.00187971,0.0003003055,0.0007804278,0.0001790769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002609437,0.00121175,0.0001509001,0.0002680275,0.0001275114,0.000005464443,0.001528651,0.00002265566,0.001119865,0.9920473,0.002058139,0.001198753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002994027,0.00210552,0.0001628873,0.0002977371,0.000152528,0.00003910395,0.0001636404,0.00004966298,0.03158274,0.9594508,0.002739839,0.0002615005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3516141,0.0002741888,0.6357428,0.0001140892,0.004481386,0.001066134,0.00002777132,0.00004954355,0.006629933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898652,0.000008456678,0.009492675,0.00002230437,0.0003579212,0.000004513195,0.000001412141,0.0000957932,0.0001516522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6382511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8166904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05778111569077619,"score_gpt":0.3251453359292176,"score_spread":0.2673642202384414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}