{"id":"W2078121532","doi":"10.1016/j.ejc.2012.02.004","title":"On a bijective proof of a factorization formula for Macdonald polynomials","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Combinatorics","topic":"Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Factorization; Combinatorics; Bijection; Combinatorial proof; Symmetric function; Macdonald polynomials; Pure mathematics; Orthogonal polynomials; Classical orthogonal polynomials","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002929124,0.002524394,0.002099949,0.003421208,0.004253585,0.004563041,0.003031767,0.002630474,0.02056447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01248952,0.001422404,0.003767256,0.003266468,0.004945892,0.01150882,0.009540412,0.00857015,0.003772941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002477554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001362363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003093047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003507476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980909,0.0005663946,0.000110235,0.0003076231,0.0006488871,0.0002759978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941076,0.003974548,0.000176868,0.0005437686,0.0008473755,0.0003499205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008685,0.0001366109,0.0002799427,0.0002676026,0.00004339733,0.0004552898,0.0008549794,0.001080535,0.002378541,0.964034,0.01005375,0.02032858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004744548,0.00003527675,0.0002690611,0.00007147662,0.0000450095,0.0002305565,0.0001266884,0.003791095,0.001163708,0.9810377,0.01312464,0.00005731052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07413577,0.004034161,0.7054272,0.01248994,0.005894182,0.0003183006,0.001010502,0.00194097,0.1947489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.668929,0.003864671,0.2497267,0.006305407,0.00381083,0.0005937376,0.001461492,0.002194186,0.06311411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02056447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06879497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05778111569077619,"score_gpt":0.3251453359292176,"score_spread":0.2673642202384414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}