{"id":"W2078170481","doi":"10.1016/s0022-4375(00)00051-7","title":"Understanding reactions to safety incentives","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Safety Research","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Group cohesiveness; Structural equation modeling; Supervisor; Occupational safety and health; Interdependence; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental health; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Medicine; Political science; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01384411,0.000278842,0.0003852059,0.0009942519,0.001461106,0.007632651,0.0009068741,0.004940661,0.02119829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07651277,0.0005516546,0.0004252294,0.0006123156,0.003566354,0.007021037,0.002157238,0.004812709,0.001053846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003074883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001753507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003563263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002268562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935414,0.003298905,0.0003008067,0.0006066576,0.001213407,0.001038842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9341785,0.04523586,0.01130387,0.002504494,0.004519498,0.002257773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001586008,0.001312459,0.1354823,0.0003179222,0.0001819261,0.0008839071,0.03447326,0.007702032,0.003135436,0.7278437,0.01398906,0.07309207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002586304,0.000515745,0.1000838,0.0002463829,0.0001409576,0.0002752201,0.05064045,0.0143509,0.002106,0.7770652,0.05418283,0.0001338592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6940912,0.0007852045,0.01024884,0.03671811,0.000309921,0.0001216988,0.000153778,0.00004833352,0.2575229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942902,0.0001592162,0.0004763861,0.001170867,0.00005518636,0.00002189341,0.00003945986,0.00001298625,0.003773675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02119829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07321554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.562607839702456,"score_gpt":0.5931572948566836,"score_spread":0.03054945515422758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}