{"id":"W2078170481","doi":"10.1016/s0022-4375(00)00051-7","title":"Understanding reactions to safety incentives","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Safety Research","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Group cohesiveness; Structural equation modeling; Supervisor; Occupational safety and health; Interdependence; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental health; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Medicine; Political science; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01727037,0.0001466869,0.0004196352,0.001249678,0.003107728,0.00002705754,0.0005631153,0.0002228228,0.003002507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004393422,0.0001196926,0.0001456419,0.002235554,0.0001719996,0.0004463084,0.0002894683,0.00348615,0.001056918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003283906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002716792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001994451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001584793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918461,0.00253741,0.001608901,0.0002557328,0.002355129,0.001396693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886574,0.006910702,0.0003401265,0.0003605042,0.002598429,0.00113283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06007279,0.001630413,0.5737752,0.00102646,0.000403748,0.0006754578,0.01394748,0.001059917,0.00307243,0.1289724,0.1571863,0.05817739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001771667,0.0009314201,0.2565268,0.000800028,0.000006999673,0.00006110681,0.01015681,0.000131361,0.00001285248,0.004958649,0.7244939,0.0001484587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1658555,0.0009444443,0.06616094,0.1967881,0.005231683,0.005378583,0.000146847,0.0001128428,0.5593811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790201,0.004910838,0.001317433,0.0005248878,0.001838555,0.0000371593,0.000009927422,0.00004299115,0.01229813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8131647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.562607839702456,"score_gpt":0.5931572948566836,"score_spread":0.03054945515422758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}