{"id":"W2078185678","doi":"10.1063/1.4757584","title":"Oxygen vacancy filament formation in TiO2: A kinetic Monte Carlo study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Physics","topic":"Advanced Memory and Neural Computing","field":"Engineering","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Kinetic Monte Carlo; Protein filament; Vacancy defect; Condensed matter physics; Diffusion; Electric field; Monte Carlo method; Chemical physics; Materials science; Density functional theory; Chemistry; Computational chemistry; Physics; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004312009,0.0003421121,0.0006501625,0.0005364704,0.0006715385,0.0006487546,0.0009169477,0.000985533,0.001260877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00110994,0.000373685,0.0005703182,0.000430731,0.0007280313,0.0006571735,0.0003386732,0.0004781313,0.00008681531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009317692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006982044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01093674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004979538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999121,0.00002438561,0.000003377768,0.00001099709,0.00002170796,0.00002738813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993393,0.0004012902,0.00007898836,0.00004981382,0.00008165349,0.00004896311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008008243,0.00006026036,0.001981597,0.00004872146,0.00003104965,0.0001774669,0.00004325767,0.9813468,0.003695726,0.01137541,0.0001634275,0.0009960984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006796239,0.000008425306,0.000136943,0.000001656992,0.000003118116,0.000008652441,0.000004113048,0.9990774,0.0002543195,0.000455195,0.00004022671,0.00000307503],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719972,0.0003945112,0.02138202,0.0003204662,0.00002247815,0.00003512453,0.0001608346,0.00008857969,0.005598783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940786,0.0001511856,0.004798306,0.00004070883,0.00001108439,0.00004491075,0.0000812882,0.00002612142,0.0007676557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01093674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02174616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01875648960171185,"score_gpt":0.2402397957036465,"score_spread":0.2214833061019347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}