{"id":"W2078284106","doi":"10.1007/s00267-008-9088-4","title":"Politics of Co-Optation: Community Forest Management Versus Joint Forest Management in Orissa, India","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Research Manitoba","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Joint Forest Management; Forest management; Community forestry; Scope (computer science); Government (linguistics); Certified wood; Business; Forest protection; Environmental resource management; Geography; Forestry; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000543583,0.0004534828,0.000373001,0.0003739674,0.0007698375,0.00003224413,0.0008211741,0.00009691991,0.001383403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003713751,0.0004940137,0.0001821779,0.0004447628,0.0006961544,0.0002517153,0.002070934,0.0002999035,0.0008998552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00112674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003214606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005771233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002279185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966071,0.0002156707,0.0007473633,0.0006131926,0.001115698,0.0007009528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984534,0.00005120551,0.0002844923,0.001014371,0.000003459385,0.0001930516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001869868,0.001855077,0.9689299,0.0002868984,0.0004426715,0.0004888378,0.002111307,0.01402199,0.00002941076,0.001320155,0.003509864,0.006816909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003496757,0.0001994737,0.9502959,0.00004341851,0.0001559678,0.00000483385,0.007945979,0.0003402343,0.0000577974,0.0003993532,0.03659208,0.0004682555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8757649,0.0000506449,0.0003133744,0.000174607,0.0002423551,0.001496875,0.00003297509,0.00005756239,0.1218667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875867,0.0009586956,0.003104725,0.0003260782,0.00002948648,0.0001232497,0.0002109549,0.00003688845,0.007623249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1142435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02681408117436007,"score_gpt":0.2108258557654714,"score_spread":0.1840117745911113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}