{"id":"W2078301503","doi":"10.1139/f05-249","title":"Effect of the spatial arrangement of habitat patches on the development of fish habitat models in the littoral zone of a Canadian Shield lake","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Littoral zone; Habitat; Sampling (signal processing); Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fish habitat; Ecology; Physical geography; Fishery; Geography; Biology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002593594,0.0007014788,0.0004779967,0.0007046135,0.0007420869,0.001248989,0.0008295964,0.0003793018,0.0004683142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004674551,0.0004243406,0.0007868768,0.0005287638,0.0006322992,0.0005738012,0.0008651876,0.0003356446,0.00007020785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004416157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004406149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6186196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6568922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993661,0.0002676621,0.00002882437,0.0001783953,0.00006315853,0.00009589997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975398,0.001641117,0.0002165377,0.0001048653,0.0002724565,0.0002252604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002323058,0.00005441912,0.2070923,0.00002791549,0.0002302047,0.00008320185,0.0001711999,0.7817292,0.001172034,0.000433086,0.0002615511,0.008512511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001576355,0.00005150079,0.03371602,0.00000811051,0.00006228501,0.00002087144,0.00008398174,0.9654725,0.0002477065,0.0001674249,0.0001384582,0.00001535911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956929,0.00005951084,0.003617174,0.00004433885,0.000002258388,0.00001135445,0.00009957307,0.00005284333,0.0004200439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996004,0.00003475246,0.003567526,0.00001276923,0.000001523307,0.000009522029,0.0001583428,0.00001248324,0.0001990142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3813804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7672529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01581779962593984,"score_gpt":0.1932032025073196,"score_spread":0.1773854028813798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}