{"id":"W2078368523","doi":"10.1080/10427710050025349","title":"Roundtable: The Progress of Heterodox Economics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Heterodoxy; Subversion; Dissenting opinion; Mainstream; Status quo; Subject (documents); Positive economics; Theme (computing); Mainstream economics; Political science; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Orthodoxy; Law; Applied economics; Politics; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001456193,0.0001701246,0.0007157797,0.0001310045,0.000100286,0.00001948957,0.001124086,0.00008917289,0.002044812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004552677,0.00013223,0.0005579383,0.00005943632,0.0005886875,0.0007971883,0.00006164589,0.0002702651,0.0001034402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001348085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002869766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005060025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003592122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977261,0.0000602026,0.001794689,0.0001895833,0.00002368098,0.0002057606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965672,0.0001002769,0.002542252,0.0006898644,0.00003595066,0.00006440254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003968175,0.0004426882,0.00899764,0.0002712951,0.0008364109,0.000002561648,0.001598777,0.01312281,0.00007398206,0.8453566,0.123877,0.005023467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006717229,0.000104345,0.001729653,0.0001402096,0.0000524296,0.00009643212,0.00004533314,0.0002000348,0.0002472676,0.02503859,0.9714833,0.0001906729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8331928,0.05512796,0.00008130247,0.004053787,0.01020415,0.0003635854,0.0002226064,0.00001053821,0.09674325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363026,0.003918087,0.0003230495,0.000681876,0.0004618016,0.000006878257,0.000001727164,0.0000330195,0.05827095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8476064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03299316343841536,"score_gpt":0.2138771304421122,"score_spread":0.1808839670036969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}