{"id":"W2078368523","doi":"10.1080/10427710050025349","title":"Roundtable: The Progress of Heterodox Economics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Heterodoxy; Subversion; Dissenting opinion; Mainstream; Status quo; Subject (documents); Positive economics; Theme (computing); Mainstream economics; Political science; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Orthodoxy; Law; Applied economics; Politics; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006408511,0.0007452257,0.0009997117,0.00105064,0.004073943,0.009736982,0.00159492,0.004785629,0.03400397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01283863,0.0003445442,0.001010025,0.0008324982,0.004292072,0.01369834,0.006534283,0.01307115,0.008116424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003128557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004417711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001147771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00145904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966475,0.001482188,0.00007853017,0.0005521003,0.0007617015,0.0004778868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922504,0.003719656,0.0002650157,0.0007276186,0.001318035,0.001719246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006780773,0.0000556392,0.0001055443,0.0001457366,0.00001461492,0.00007652813,0.001223505,0.0002566019,0.0002219836,0.1923204,0.7744996,0.03101215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001706785,0.00003411909,0.000224375,0.0002823466,0.000005510713,0.00004878342,0.001021442,0.000264143,0.0001502754,0.09138073,0.9065504,0.00002084473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.004018164,0.0578027,0.007346214,0.6103714,0.2547021,0.00007277443,0.0002535382,0.0002322859,0.0652009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1486361,0.06747375,0.01142402,0.1697281,0.2956166,0.0003674699,0.0004655685,0.0008938988,0.3053945],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03400397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1137546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03299316343841536,"score_gpt":0.2138771304421122,"score_spread":0.1808839670036969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}