{"id":"W2078456473","doi":"10.1007/s10958-005-0154-7","title":"Block LU factorization is stable for block matrices whose inverses are block diagonally dominant","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Sciences","topic":"Matrix Theory and Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Combinatorics; Diagonally dominant matrix; Factorization; Block (permutation group theory); Row; Inverse; Block matrix; LU decomposition; Diagonal; Matrix decomposition; Pure mathematics; Algorithm; Invertible matrix; Geometry; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00109991,0.001455574,0.001276923,0.001098513,0.001101265,0.002032637,0.0005737763,0.001011965,0.00661729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111946,0.0006115767,0.0005250326,0.001116953,0.001493938,0.002781344,0.001272228,0.001208829,0.004262952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000411306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001276898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001228873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001604021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988005,0.0002492172,0.000048847,0.0002718197,0.0004123273,0.0002173511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948985,0.002044882,0.0005761224,0.0007878047,0.001497528,0.0001951391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002498141,0.0003564034,0.002498301,0.0005949856,0.0002250676,0.0005020224,0.0007289154,0.09995574,0.2060668,0.3790761,0.02088271,0.2866148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001536598,0.0005174949,0.0009719973,0.00005062353,0.00004979123,0.0003350589,0.0003102582,0.6132773,0.0349514,0.3418672,0.007413129,0.0001020576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04200817,0.0002977799,0.949423,0.0003510703,0.0001869279,0.00007419351,0.0003076095,0.0009641557,0.00638713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7699534,0.0007576956,0.2042387,0.0006601127,0.000536943,0.000344099,0.001500501,0.00078363,0.02122497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00661729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02213699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02504249192531585,"score_gpt":0.2783652091636581,"score_spread":0.2533227172383422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}