{"id":"W2078592786","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905229979","title":"Pro-Family Politics and Fringe Parties in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Law; Political economy; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007722723,0.00005537232,0.000102562,0.0001985552,0.0003676441,0.0001182249,0.000258641,0.00002796591,0.00002640376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006682494,0.00005044953,0.00001678568,0.0002699344,0.001014474,0.0002848967,0.00001287332,0.0001388115,0.000001814835],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002248665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03211033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981003,0.00005324677,0.0002419988,0.0001011077,0.0004250985,0.001078188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973954,0.00007143021,0.00005007298,0.00006410365,0.0001869494,0.002232061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[3.347965e-7,0.000003420932,0.07748584,0.000002565301,0.000001196686,0.00002878316,0.002464555,0.00002045629,0.00002967288,0.9190786,0.0002570722,0.0006274598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001574424,0.00002365694,0.9432305,0.00002674482,0.000005826303,0.000025876,0.02236038,0.0001674767,0.0002719347,0.01648961,0.01711191,0.0001286559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710826,0.0001570092,0.000009099469,0.01184149,0.0002640216,0.00004998701,0.000005771087,0.000001371759,0.0165887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984512,0.000007877324,0.000184453,0.000937594,0.0002508581,5.494559e-7,7.568535e-8,0.000002773899,0.0001646082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.902589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9733767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04010787822886523,"score_gpt":0.3032319830205816,"score_spread":0.2631241047917164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}