{"id":"W2078701858","doi":"10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.063","title":"Uncertainty propagation in environmental decision making using random sets","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Procedia Environmental Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Uncertainty quantification; Probability density function; Set (abstract data type); Propagation of uncertainty; Mathematics; Interpretation (philosophy); Uncertainty theory; Random variable; Computer science; Probability distribution; Possibility theory; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01881957,0.001231713,0.001825101,0.004041542,0.001054895,0.004288872,0.001725793,0.001583309,0.001559329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04786318,0.0009748967,0.00192893,0.003286841,0.004180459,0.005336813,0.00266815,0.002259643,0.0001888497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002991786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001264963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003789574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001772298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843575,0.01016592,0.0007179853,0.001228247,0.003020647,0.0005096107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9323966,0.06011951,0.003562227,0.001281645,0.002279003,0.0003610182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004063816,0.00002376045,0.0004516545,0.00007889143,0.00008316703,0.0001751681,0.0001593212,0.7420396,0.0002579973,0.2446871,0.0001896469,0.01181311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009537558,0.00002537408,0.0001258364,0.00003773426,0.00001931647,0.00003296609,0.00003280589,0.8262454,0.0002140058,0.1729293,0.0003029685,0.000024829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02076591,0.000324981,0.975719,0.0003849594,0.00003968522,0.00006479204,0.00003372409,0.00005240118,0.002614519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7955155,0.0007273808,0.201468,0.0001334608,0.0001333954,0.0003334346,0.00007702007,0.00003896121,0.001572849],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01881957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09952861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07350891885830818,"score_gpt":0.3825496857268719,"score_spread":0.3090407668685637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}