{"id":"W2078788386","doi":"10.1002/asi.23469","title":"What motivates people to review articles? The case of the human‐computer interaction community","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Expert finding and Q&A systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Relevance (law); Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Process (computing); Public relations; Medical education; Applied psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2068856,0.001047658,0.001482888,0.0113117,0.02848558,0.03141326,0.003776222,0.01345756,0.006632411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5429708,0.001533936,0.001419273,0.006857761,0.01559663,0.01757064,0.01291973,0.007025348,0.003030688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008169618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02146892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00398518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008172918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5671242,0.359493,0.01119209,0.0126069,0.04097476,0.00860896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2233537,0.5612307,0.07641289,0.02698176,0.06173095,0.05029004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007342054,0.000773948,0.08100631,0.003354898,0.0007617511,0.0161539,0.4344802,0.0007712112,0.005316295,0.04126513,0.1256425,0.2897396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004596176,0.0007912855,0.0547571,0.002633533,0.0003806146,0.01234158,0.3100991,0.004242859,0.001695471,0.08143899,0.5302613,0.0008985786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4043675,0.01326953,0.04348328,0.4053296,0.004508972,0.001285031,0.0001462271,0.001162203,0.1264476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368329,0.002986495,0.02145927,0.02397793,0.003354932,0.0009609794,0.00009480566,0.0004553585,0.009877295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7931144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9780513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03560543228195858,"score_gpt":0.315803675541707,"score_spread":0.2801982432597485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}