{"id":"W2078801166","doi":"10.7577/formakademisk.787","title":"A Framework for Systemic Design","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Systems thinking; Design thinking; Knowledge management; Computer science; Ambiguity; Framing (construction); Leverage (statistics); Process management; Management science; Engineering; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03049615,0.001250146,0.00228269,0.001454927,0.001968603,0.001600045,0.003857164,0.001081117,0.0002326768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03767807,0.001004812,0.001463217,0.002018221,0.0004525744,0.001354957,0.0002852039,0.0007169633,0.000632891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002659147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004256474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001184468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001291481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863297,0.001462677,0.004154305,0.002482039,0.003118891,0.00245237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939545,0.0525597,0.002469608,0.002638385,0.001871057,0.0009162677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002952294,0.000170493,0.0004000659,0.0002486395,0.0002338921,0.0000106563,0.001968385,0.02933283,0.003496364,0.6543166,0.2579352,0.04893458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002192438,0.0013988,0.00003346649,0.0004354593,0.0001288622,0.0002699078,0.0004042264,0.3011234,0.001610306,0.5940149,0.09730757,0.001080697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006674165,0.001045088,0.9877387,0.0003757526,0.001692226,0.007278867,0.00007823927,0.0006450933,0.0004786234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3569457,0.000008390226,0.6352078,0.0007730314,0.001203501,0.002302741,0.00001588127,0.000229289,0.003313624],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3562783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2350676982831969,"score_gpt":0.4060984979931475,"score_spread":0.1710307997099506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}