{"id":"W2078946154","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00528.x","title":"Innovation in the Absence of Principled Knowledge: The Case of the Wright Brothers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Creativity and Innovation Management","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Competitor analysis; Closing (real estate); Product (mathematics); Unintended consequences; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Management; Operations research; Economics; Political science; Law; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01026772,0.00008219972,0.0001340997,0.000560287,0.0002633203,0.0001034352,0.0007934482,0.00003426658,0.00003813466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001195778,0.00003440051,0.00002580122,0.01134811,0.0004471063,0.0003324156,0.0001342087,0.0001848075,0.000003697055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002160302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004066455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003419634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004412491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978625,0.0003606786,0.0007013284,0.0002307828,0.0007012167,0.0001434911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980912,0.000554424,0.0004102662,0.0005161689,0.0004187127,0.00000918556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001810631,0.00009776586,0.01034217,0.00001497878,0.000005920853,0.000004638724,0.002774672,0.00008239624,0.00103345,0.8079765,0.002126326,0.175523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005084446,0.00009288183,0.8057374,0.0000689138,0.000006693727,0.00001530717,0.007898537,0.004273467,0.002630818,0.1481962,0.03045902,0.0001122691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382792,0.00004149749,0.002504264,0.00524108,0.00005139269,0.0005872147,0.000002758378,0.000004193073,0.05328836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971754,0.00002541444,0.0001090994,0.0004728083,0.00001822638,0.00001299142,6.862326e-7,0.000001625267,0.002183734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7953953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5452391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1291719999533349,"score_gpt":0.4280744576379127,"score_spread":0.2989024576845778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}