{"id":"W2078997102","doi":"10.1177/0020702014546338","title":"Multilateral solutions to bilateral problems: The 1972 Stockholm conference and Canadian foreign environmental policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"U.S. Department of State","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Political science; Arctic; Environmental policy; Environmental law; Foreign policy; Public administration; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Law; Politics; Geography; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009616299,0.0001866023,0.0003222498,0.0005970473,0.0009578425,0.0003486495,0.000856089,0.00006860867,0.0000980899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006570885,0.0001318951,0.00022075,0.000802401,0.0003405456,0.0003525777,0.0001330005,0.0003181153,0.000003789291],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005611604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01002209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969763,0.0002628311,0.0006128955,0.0001461357,0.001368414,0.0006333782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972759,0.00006112183,0.0004445084,0.0001101012,0.000535365,0.001572964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004331085,0.0002050025,0.279478,0.000007221622,0.01592217,0.001260983,0.03890195,0.02104755,0.00002577491,0.1487696,0.4682913,0.02565743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001378218,0.0002342577,0.1801862,0.00007167565,0.0009281915,0.001556837,0.0225729,0.0007287675,0.000003168626,0.03713039,0.7546357,0.0005736393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2289683,0.000665941,0.0004773325,0.7566094,0.0006012387,0.0001827593,0.0004960485,0.000007087114,0.01199184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905585,0.0002393389,0.0001656151,0.00659443,0.002044649,0.000002077353,0.000002674846,0.000006861938,0.0003858434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7615902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0329062343986217,"score_gpt":0.3167302926965192,"score_spread":0.2838240582978975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}